Wording For Experience Certificate

Zapatero error "Vive la noche" or sell a resounding failure as success

Yesterday I read with surprise a newspaper article entitled Today "When going out at night does not mean going to bottle" , signed by journalist Inma Sánchez . I say surprise, because every sentence article I read made me shiver more and more, to the total and absolute demonstration of ignorance on the subject shown in that article, someone less naive than I could get confused with self-serving manipulation of data.

First, the article states that the program "Vive la noche" organized by the Ayto of Badajoz through the Department of Youth, intended as an alternative to the bottle. then tells us it is from Tuesday to Friday. Well, the bottle, first place or not on Tuesday or Wednesday the . But also, more users day is Saturday, and that day is not done. How can you pretend to be an alternative to the bottle when the four days that you are two there is no such bottle, and the busiest day directory is not?

Secondly, as indicated in the article, the activities start at eight pm and end at noon. The ignorance comes not only days but also the hours . The bottle BEGINS at 12 pm, and "Live Summer" ends at 12 pm. How, for God's sake, it will be an alternative, if not even match the hours of each other?

Third, the story is accompanied by a video , you can see in the upper right corner. Well, if you click the video, you find that the majority of users are children . But children 10 or 12 years, no more. Well, it seems, that both the City to the author, these children are young assumptions to which they are proposing an alternative to the bottle. As everyone knows, the 10 year olds go to the bottle.

Fourth, says the program "Live the Night" has more than 600 users. What is not explained is whether they are 600 users each day or 600 for the whole summer, even if the same users who go over and over again, or if you are 600 different. The low specificity casts serious doubt on the reliability of the data.

Fifth, if we consider that there are about 33,000 young (really young between 15 and 30 years) who are registered in Badajoz of which allegedly , 600 are users, leaving us who are users, always pulling the top and assuming that 600 users are different, an average of 1.8 per 100 potential users, and that taking into account that we are counting children as older than 15 years. Ie less than 2% potential users of "live the night" is used. Far from the supposed "success," according to the article, has the program among young people.

I do not know who try to deceive , the data are before, and are objective. It makes no sense to write an article of this kind of praise quasi propaganda when is clear that the program "Live the Night" is one of the most resounding failures of Badajoz City both in its ultimate goal of becoming a real alternative to the bottle, as in the influx of people, or approach activities.